gettyWe've frequently criticized the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's "Article III standing" jurisprudence. So we were quite floored to learn of the published December 4, 2020 decision (argued on December 5, 2018) in McGee v. S-L Snacks National. trans fat). The suits have alleged either that trans fat's presence in a food or a truthful front-of-label "zero trans fat" claim violate California consumer-protection laws. The product labeling contained no assurances of safety, and absent some false representation about the product's use of trans fat, McGee could not prevail on this theory of harm.

Source: Forbes December 21, 2020 18:33 UTC