Mary Stone Ross, opponent of Proposition 24, which would strengthen state privacy lawAdvertisementIt will appear on the November ballot as Proposition 24. The “pay for privacy” provision is already part of the privacy law. Ross, who has described herself as a privacy advocate, counts some high-tech companies subject to the privacy law among her consulting clients. She argued then, as the article headline stated, that the privacy law “doesn’t go far enough.”She wrote then that “industry has relentlessly lobbied for legislation that will fundamentally undermine” the privacy law. She says she’s not averse to taking money from the tech industry, even though it’s a central target of the privacy law.

Source: Los Angeles Times August 28, 2020 12:56 UTC