The Lewis’ Bench was far from being perfect, but under his tenure, the Supreme Court gained public confidence by drastically punishing lawyers for misconduct. Even though on April 16, 2019, Jackson’s case was argued and heard by four Justices of the Supreme Court, it is not clear why the Supreme Court ordered re-argument into the case. Aware that the Supreme Court usually takes judicial notice of unfolding developments in the press, the public wonders why would the Supreme Court still recognize and invite Cllr. How can the Supreme Court restore public confidence in its work amidst these vexing questions? For the Supreme Court to restore public confidence, it needs to recoil and spurn every form of political repression and legal skullduggery.

Source: Daily Observer January 20, 2020 02:15 UTC