Lorna Lynch SC, for the defendant, said the sensitive information was originally submitted as evidence by the plaintiff, Ms Little. Mr Kean, for Ms Little, told the court that the sensitive information originated from CHI in the first instance. Ms Haughey told the court she had been placed in “very invidious position” where highly sensitive personal health data had been sent to her “in unredacted form”. She said she believed the sensitive personal health data was ”not relevant, nor germane” to her client’s legal action against CHI. Among other things, Ms Little claims she was deprived of her right to call witnesses in her defence, introduce exculpatory documentary evidence, challenge erroneous findings of fact, or examine witnesses.

Source: The Irish Times November 20, 2025 03:43 UTC